The RSPB should hang its head in shame, says NGO, after court rules that the bird charity provided unlawfully obtained evidence to support the prosecution of a gamekeeper The National Gamekeepers’ Organisation has said that the RSPB should hang its head in shame after it was revealed at Northallerton Magistrates Court on 12 February 2015
Would you like to appear on our site? We offer sponsored articles and advertising to put you in front of our readers. Find out moreThe RSPB should hang its head in shame, says NGO, after court rules that the bird charity provided unlawfully obtained evidence to support the prosecution of a gamekeeper
The National Gamekeepers’ Organisation has said that the RSPB should hang its head in shame after it was revealed at Northallerton Magistrates Court on 12 February 2015 that the bird charity had provided unlawfully obtained covert surveillance evidence from a hidden camera in order to support the prosecution of a gamekeeper from North Yorkshire. The court dismissed the case after hearing legal arguments that an “abuse of process” had taken place and that the grouse keeper, who has been described as a man of “impeccable character”, could not receive a fair trial.
The case, brought by the Crown Prosecution Service, had centred on evidence that had been obtained unlawfully by the RSPB. The charges related to the quality of the water and the shelter provided for decoy birds in a cage trap during April 2014.
A spokesman for the National Gamekeepers’ Organisation said: “The RSPB should be hanging its head in shame today after providing unlawfully obtained evidence to support the prosecution of a gamekeeper. The RSPB was so scurrilous as to plant a covert surveillance camera, and film for more than 380 hours, without the permission of the landowner, nor with any lawful justification. It’s a disgrace that the RSPB – now widely seen as a self-styled wildlife police force – should operate in this manner. The RSPB needs to get its house in order. “
He added: “It makes us wonder whether the RSPB may be out of control? The fact that this case was dismissed so swiftly is in our view perhaps indicative of the depths to which the RSPB will stoop in order to create the illusion, both for the court and for the public, of a gamekeeper being involved in wildlife crime. The RSPB is, it seems, singlehandedly destroying its own reputation and credibility by the use of covert surveillance cameras. How can anyone trust its word in the future? We hope the RSPB has now learned its lesson, its knuckles having been soundly rapped by the decision of the court. We hope it has the decency to apologise to all concerned.”
Mr Sleightholm was represented by leading country sports barrister Peter Glenser, of 9 Bedford Row, and specialist solicitor, Tim Ryan, of Warners Solicitors.
Get the latest news delivered direct to your door
Subscribe to Sporting Gun magazine and immerse yourself in the world of clay, game and rough shooting. As the leading monthly publication for passionate shooters at all levels, Sporting Gun delivers expert advice, practical tips and in-depth reviews to enhance your skills and enjoyment of the sport.
With features ranging from gundog training to pigeon shooting, and wildfowling to equipment recommendations, you’ll gain valuable insights from professional shooters and industry experts. A subscription not only saves you money on the cover price but also includes £2 million Public Liability Insurance, covering the use of shotguns, rifles and airguns for both recreational and professional use.